The Historical Society recently purchased the papers of New York City banker and businessman Samuel Flewwelling (1774 or 5-1849) primarily relating to property held by his wife, Julia Elvira Canfield Flewwelling (1791-1868), and him in the Western Reserve, later Ohio. Following Samuel’s death, the properties were managed by William Mackay (1795-1873), a New York City businessman and the husband of Caroline Emma Canfield Mackay. The collections includes indentures, agreements, leases, deeds, statements and accounts, and correspondence.The papers are arranged chronologically in one series and consist mostly of documents concerning the conveyance land in the Western Reserve. The earliest document outlines the partitioning of land Judson Canfield and others purchased from the Connecticut Land Co. in 1799. Flewwelling acquired land from Canfield as early as 1815. Some of the later sales were among members of Flewwelling’s family, including his father-in-law Judson Canfield, his brother-in-law Henry J. Canfield, and his brother- and sister-in-law Frederick Augustus Tallmadge and Elizabeth Canfield Tallmadge. Flewwelling provided mortgages to some of the purchasers of land, and the agreements contained in the papers spell out the payment terms. The finding aid, completed by Leith Johnson, is already available online.
Johnson also completed the finding aid for a related collection, the papers of Judson Canfield. The collection consists primarily of legal documents, including agreements, deeds, executions, receipts, statements, and correspondence. The papers also include a small collection of correspondence and writings relating to Walter Ferriss, whose daughter married Canfield’s son.
The study of Connecticut’s participation in settling the Western Reserve lands will certainly be enriched by access to these collections.
Category Archives: Artifacts and Archives
Civic Records
The Historical Society is pleased to announce the acquisition of several important collections of civic records. St. Paul’s Masonic Lodge, the Litchfield Garden Club, and the Litchfield County University Club have all voted to donate their records to the Society.
The records of St. Paul’s Lodge and the Litchfield Garden Club have been on deposit since the 1970s, and a collection of books once used by the Lodge as a lending library have been on loan since approximately 1906. The Litchfield County University Club, founded in 1896, recently located several scrapbooks of records dating to the earliest days of the Club. One of the club’s first vice presidents was George C. Woodruff of Litchfield, whose papers are in the Society’s collection.
If you are a member of a civic group whose records we have yet to document please consider donating your materials. If you would like to discuss it with the archivist, call Linda Hocking at 860-567-4501 or e-mail archivist@litchfieldhistoricalsociety.org.
Professional Photography
A big part of the mission of the Historical Society is to make the collection accessible to the public. This is done through exhibitions at the museum’s two sites, the website, educational and public programs, and publications.
The Historical Society is often contacted by academic researchers and historians who are writing books and wish to use some item in our collection as an illustration in their work. Some of our more popular requests are for the Ralph Earl portraits of Benjamin Tallmadge and Mary Floyd Tallmadge as well as needleworks and embroideries produced by students attending the Litchfield Female Academy.
The writers and publishers they are working with need high quality images to use in the publications. To serve their needs and also to have quality images of items in our collection for other uses, we work with professional photographer David Stansbury of Stansbury Photography in Springfield, MA.
David generally visits the museum at least once a year for a full day of work. This is a fairly time consuming process as space has to be set aside in the museum for him to work, objects have to be pulled off display or out of storage and ready for their moment in front of the camera and then everything has to be returned so the visiting public is unaware any changes every took place.
David Stansbury at right in the winter of 2008 as the Historical Society prepared for the publication of the exhibition catalog To Please Any Taste: Litchfield County Furniture & Furniture Makers, 1780-1830
David travels with a van load of equipment and is challenged with creating a mock photography studio in one of the museum’s rooms. Flood lights, back drops, and tripods are arranged and adjusted as each artifact is placed in front of the camera.
David as he adjusts an image on his computer
His work is impeccable and the images he has created for the museum have been used countless times in all manner of publications.
The photographer sessions are often held in the Liggett Gallery of the Litchfield History Museum. The large gallery provides ample space for the equipment
David will be visiting the museum again soon after we close for the season at the end of November. He will be photographing many of the materials related to the Litchfield Female Academy and Litchfield Law School that have not already been captured. These images will be used in future exhibitions, educational programs and in the upcoming Litchfield Law School and Litchfield Female Academy database which will be released in 2011.
Mourning Jewelry
The Litchfield Historical Society has a significant collection of mourning jewelry and many of the pieces were donated to the museum by the descendents of the individuals who owned the pieces.
Mourning brooch made of human hair, 2006-41-1 Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Babbitt
Mourning jewelry seems strange and even grotesque to many people today. If you are unfamilar with the term, mourning jewelry is a piece of jewelry constructed primarily of human hair. It was a very common practice for loved ones to exhange locks of hair. It was a tangible way for a person to be remembered in the days before photography. Throughout the late 18th and early 19th century, the recently deceased were often memorialized through the practice of taking a lock of hair and having it incorporated into a piece of jewelry. Rings, necklaces, bracelets and even earrings were made of hair. For men, watch chains and rings were popular forms. The bereaved were comforted by keeping a piece of their deceased loved one close to them.

Bracelet made of human hair, 1937-07-4, Gift of the William Colgate Estate

Pair of earring made of human hair and jet, 1923-04-6 Gift of Mrs. Edwards W. Seymour
It was a skill that many women practiced at home. Molds were sold and instructions were available through magazines like Godey’s Ladies Book which was published from 1830 to 1878. There were also businesses that formed in larger towns and cities that offered the service of creating mourning jewelry for the public. Mourning jewelry became especially prolific during the Civil War when many American households lost loved ones to battle and disease.
Jewelry Box, C. Linherr Artist in Hair 577 Broadway New York City, Donor Unknown
This October, the Historical Society has a small display case in the Ching Reading Room of the Helga J. Ingraham Memorial Library which showcases some of the museum’s mourning jewelry collection. In addition, the case includes other artifacts and archives associated with mourning and the ritual of death.
A Controversial Collection: Modern Art at the Litchfield Historical Society
Nestled in the northwest corner of Connecticut, the town of Litchfield exudes colonial charm, picturesque views, and historic homes. Founded in 1856, the Litchfield Historical Society’s collection, which formally began in the 1890s, strongly reflects the early founders of the town and the prosperous times of the early 19th century.Did I mention the institution also has a collection of local modern artists?
The Historical Society’s first foray into modern art began in 1957 when the museum sponsored a local art exhibition.Over the next decade local artist such as Austin Purves, Peggy Reventlow, Nils Hogner and Stanley Mortimer exhibited their works for one week a year at the Center School cafeteria.Works could be purchased by visitors with part of the proceeds benefiting the museum.

View Up North Street by Nils Hogner
In 1972, the Society became further involved with the local art movement when a fund was established by an anonymous donor for the purchase of contemporary art. In the Board President’s annual address for that year, Mrs. Sonia Seherr-Thoss commented on the fund,
A sum of money has been donated for the purchase of local contemporary works of art. The fund is not large but the donor expects to make this an annual gift. Our Litchfield area has many important artists and we would certainly be remiss as a Historical Society is we did not have a representative selection of their works. Mr. Rufus Stillman, who has a broad knowledge of the field and a most discerning eye, has agreed to serve as Chairman of Modern Acquisitions. I am sure we will all be watching with deep interest the growth of our contemporary collection and will enjoy the opportunity to study the creative activities of our regional artists.
Rufus Stillman was the natural choice to chair the Modern Acquisitions committee.He was a Litchfield resident who was interested in the modernist movement.In 1950, Stillman had hired Marcel Breuer to build his family home in Litchfield.Breuer went on to build three homes for Stillman as well as such public commissions as the Litchfield High School which was completed in 1960.

Untitled by Alexander Calder, oil on board
Stillman embraced his role as chair of the Modern Acquisitions committee traveling around Litchfield County and other parts of Connecticut purchasing works for the Historical Society. His enthusiasm spurred other local residents to donate items from their personal collections to the museum.
The committee and movement to include modern works of art in the Society’s collection were not without controversy. Soon after the committee had been established, Board President Sonia Seherr-Thoss proposed the creation of a permanent gallery space dedicated to the exhibition of modern art. This proposal was accepted but within months, community members vocally expressed doubts about its appropriateness. At the Annual Meeting held on September 14, 1973 the recording secretary noted this exchange,
Mrs. Eugene Dooman expressed dissatisfaction with the prominence of the Modern Acquisitions display and questioned the suitability of having modern art on exhibition in an historical society museum.Mrs. George Spencer stated on the basis of experience as a volunteer attendant she could only conclude that many visitors to the museum were definitely averse to it.
There followed a lively discussion in the course of which opinion on both sides of the issue was sharply divided, and at the conclusion of the discussion, the President and Mr. Edmondson agreed to attempt to work out some compromise in handling and rotating the display that would accommodate the different points of view.
It was during this same Annual Meeting that current Director William Warren publically announced his resignation from the position. In his letter to the Board he addressed a rumor that had been circulating concerning a possible reason for his decision to leave the institution,
The other rumor has it that I was angered by the idea of our being given works of art of contemporary regional artists. I am only too happy to deny this emphatically . . . No matter if one does not care for the major arts movements of today, the artists’ works do reflect the taste of the times, just as much as Ralph Earl reflected his.
Warren’s replacement, Lockett Ford Ballard did not appear to embrace the modern art collection as openly as his predecessor.In his director’s report dated October 25, 1974, Ballard listed the modern art collection as a “problem collection” and “considered by many inappropriate for exhibition in the museum proper.”He proposed creating a rotating display of examples from this collection at the Oliver Wolcott Library.The board agreed and the brief existence of an exhibition gallery dedicated to modern art at the Historical Society ended.
The evidence of this brief and controversial campaign to include modern art in the Historical Society’s collection remains though.As a result of the efforts of individuals like Rufus Stillman, Sonia Seherr-Thoss and others, the Historical Society can now count among its collection of paintings by Ralph Earl, George Catlin and Ammi Phillips, works by Robert Osborn, Alexander Calder, Robert J. Wolff, Cleve Gray, Donald Kaufman, Nils Hogner, Norman Ives, Doris Caesar, and Stanley Mortimer.
Untitled by Doris Caesar, bronze
While in recent years, the Society has not taken as active a role in collecting living artists’ works as it did in the early 1970s, the museum is entering into a new phase.The Historical Society hopes to create a partnership with the Litchfield Visual Arts.If approved, the LVA would organize a juried show of local artists to be held at the History Museum.The first exhibition would open in July 2010 and became an annual event.The shared goal of both organizations is to highlight Litchfield’s continual and vibrant artistic community.
